**Easing** (or **interpolation**) **equations** are mostly used in **animations** to change a component value in a defined period of time.

You can move objects, change their colors, scales, rotations and anything you want simply using **easing** **equations**.

This is an **example** changing objects movement:

This process is often named “**Tweening**” and today I’d like to **discover what’s under the hood** and write about **how to create your personal “Tween”** class** all by yourself**.

- How it works
- Mathematical functions
- Lerp
- Animate our component
- EaseIn
- Optimization
- Playing with functions
- EaseOut
- EaseInOut
- Spike
- More of them!

**HOW IT WORKS**

Easing functions are useful to **change a value** **from A to B in X time,** based on a mathematical function’s graph. We’ll tweak the “percentage” parameter in the **Lerp method**, looking at mathematical functions that are **defined in the range [0,1]** (in math the square brackets mean “included” so the functions have to exist in 0 and 1 too). We choose the range **[0,1]** because in our code we’ll always pass a **percentage as a parameter**, which represents the current time of our animation. For example if 5 of 10 seconds passed we’re going to pass “**5/10**“, so “**0.5**“. It probably seems hard at the beginning if you’re not familiar with math and so on, but I’ll talk about it step by step.

**MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS**

If you don’t know what mathematical functions are here’s a really quick explanation, parallel with coding functions/methods. If you already know about them and you can jump on the Lerp section.

**In our code** we can have a **method** named **“f”**:

1 2 3 4 5 | float f(float x){ return x+4; } |

**In math** , we have **f(x) = x+4**

This means that **f(6) = 6+4 = 10,** or **f(0) = 0+4 = 4**.

The **same value** is **returned by our method** written above, if we give the same parameter.

**“f” is the name** of the function, could be “g” “h” or whatever you want. Just like our **method names**.

**X is a placeholder**, and it’s replaced by a value that you give. Just like **parameters/variables** in our codes.

After the “**=**” we have an **equation**, that **returns a value** based on the “x” that we give, just like **inside our method**.

Also, **f(x) = x+4** or **y=x+4** are the same thing.

**A function defines how a set of input values correspond to a set of output values.** **One input can return only one output.**

**FUNCTION’S GRAPH**

To display this input-output relation we can use a (2D) **cartesian coordinate system**. At each **X (input)** corresponds a **Y (output)**.

*In our case we’re always using the example f(x) = x+4.*

We can calculate a few points, such as** f(-4) = 0**, **f(-2) = 2**, **f(0) = 4**, **f(2) = 6**, and later we can connect them.

On the “X” axis we go on the value “-4” and draw a point (y=0). Then we go on the X value “-2”, go upper of 2 units (this way we go on the Y value “2” ) and we draw another point. After drawing all these points we can see that this is is a linear function and its graph is:

Of course, a computer draws all the points perfectly thanks to an algorithm, we can’t draw non-linear functions using this method (we’ll need derivatives, we’ll have to study the domain, the symmetries, the sign and so on), but that’s still useful to understand how drawing a function works without going deeper.

You can use any website that draws the graph of a function to follow up here, without having to calculate each point and more complex things. I’m using this website here.

Now that we know what mathematical functions are and how to draw and represent them, we can go forward with the “Lerp method”.

**LERP**

The method named “**Lerp**” stands for “**L**inear int**erp**olation” and has always 3 parameters, a “**start value**“, an “**end value**” and a “**percentage**” (our current progress).

It’s useful to **tweak a value “from point A to point B” based on the percentage** (progress) parameter that you give. If we want to go from 0 to 4 and **give 0.5** as percentage value, we’ll get **2** from this method (our **middle value**). **If we give 0** we’ll get ** the start value** and **if we give 1** we’ll get the **end value**.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | /// <summary> /// Linearly interpolates a value between two floats /// </summary> /// <param name="start_value">Start value</param> /// <param name="end_value">End value</param> /// <param name="pct">Our progress or percentage. [0,1]</param> /// <returns>Interpolated value between two floats</returns> static float Lerp(float start_value, float end_value, float pct) { return (start_value + (end_value - start_value) * pct); } |

In **Unity** the method** Mathf.Lerp** is **already written** and **ready to use.** Documentation about Mathf.Lerp.

**LERP IMPLEMENTATION**

We can implement **Lerp** on our **custom structs **in mainly two different ways (I’m using the **Vector3** struct as an example):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | //This is the same as Unity's "Vector3.Lerp" public Vector3 Lerp(Vector3 start_value, Vector3 end_value, float t) { t = Mathf.Clamp01(t); //assures that the given parameter "t" is between 0 and 1 return new Vector3( start_value.x + (end_value.x - start_value.x) * t, start_value.y + (end_value.y - start_value.y) * t, start_value.z + (end_value.z - start_value.z) * t ); } |

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | //This is the same as Unity's Vector3.LerpUnclamped public Vector3 LerpUnclamped(Vector3 start_value, Vector3 end_value, float t) { return new Vector3( start_value.x + (end_value.x - start_value.x) * t, start_value.y + (end_value.y - start_value.y) * t, start_value.z + (end_value.z - start_value.z) * t ); } |

Lerp each value individually, that’s the main logic! If you have a **Vector2** you can simply change the type and remove the line where there is the “z” calculation. **The same thing applies for Colors, Lights and whatever!**

The main difference between the two is that the **Lerp** assures that your **“t”** is always **between 0 and 1,** while you need to **think by yourself** if you want to use **LerpUnclamped**.

As said before, the **percentage** value **“t”** is always between the range **[0,1]**. (**0.00f** means** 0%, 0.50f** means **50%** and **1.00f** means **100%**).

Documentation**ðŸ˜•**Vector3.Lerp, Vector3.LerpUnclamped, Math.Clamp01.

You can see here my personal **performance tests** about **Lerp implementation**.

**ANIMATE OUR COMPONENT**

Now that we know about **Lerp**, we’d need a short code to see our progress! I’ll add a ball that moves from **(0,0)** to **(0,1)** in **1** second, but you can change whatever value you want! Light intensity, rotation, scale, color [….]

An **abstract fragment** of our code could be like this (to let you understand the logic):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | float time = 0; //Current time or progress float duration = 4; //Animation time while(time<=duration) //inside this loop until the time expires { object.position.y = Lerp(0, 1, time/duration); //Interpolates the object's "y" value from 0 to 1 //Wait 1 millisecond, depends on your language time += 1; //Adds one millisecond to the elapsed time } |

In **Unity** we can write a **Coroutine**:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 | /// <summary> /// Changes the object's position "y" value in X time /// </summary> /// <param name="transform">The object's transform</param> /// <param name="y_target">"Y" target coordinate</param> /// <param name="duration">The duration of the interpolation</param> /// <returns></returns> public static IEnumerator ChangeObjectYPos(Transform transform, float y_target, float duration) { float elapsed_time = 0; //Elapsed time Vector3 pos = transform.position; //Start object's position float y_start = pos.y; //Start "y" value while (elapsed_time <= duration) //Inside the loop until the time expires { pos.y = Mathf.Lerp(y_start, y_target, elapsed_time / duration); //Changes and interpolates the position's "y" value transform.position = pos;//Changes the object's position yield return null; //Waits/skips one frame elapsed_time += Time.deltaTime; //Adds to the elapsed time the amount of time needed to skip/wait one frame } } |

Documentation about Coroutines: Manual, Tutorial, Scripting API.

I’ve also written the script to show you the graph and this is what happens:

You can see that the **object’s Y coordinate** goes **from 0 to 1** **directly**, starting with a **constant speed** until the end of the animation. As the name says: **Linear interpolation.**

**You can apply an interpolation on any component you want, you just need to implement it!**

**EASE IN**

Now it’s the moment to play with math a bit, we just need to ask ourselves: what if we want to **launch a rocket**? Since rockets need time to accelerate, using the linear interpolation would be unrealistic. Can you imagine a rocket going up with a constant velocity directly from the launch? *“0/10 physics engine broken”, *someone would say.

Initially we need to find a **mathematical function** that “**starts slowly**“; the “**exponential**” one? (**x*x**) is what we need and the result is the following:

This “easing function” or “interpolation/tween type” is mostly called “**EaseIn**“, since it** starts slow**. You’ll see sometimes the name “**SmoothStart**” , which gives the same idea.

1 2 3 4 5 6 | public static float EaseIn(float t) { return t * t; } |

In our previous abstract fragment code we can now place this function:

1 2 3 | object.position.y = Lerp(0, 1, EaseIn(time/duration)); |

or here in our Unity’s Coroutine:

1 2 3 | pos.y = Mathf.Lerp(y_start, y_target, EaseIn(elapsed_time / duration)); |

You can then hit play and see the difference! Our imaginary rocket-fans would be proud of us.

The more times you elevate the “t”, the slower our component’s value will start.

**OPTIMIZATION**

If you’re wondering why I’m writing the code that way (interpolating linearly a value and giving an eased percentage instead) you can see my post here, where I “deep profile” all the different cases and choose the best one.

**PLAYING WITH FUNCTIONS**

Now that we know the overall concept we can start playing with functions even more.

**Flip**

The code to flip a function is the following:

1 2 3 4 5 6 | static float Flip(float x) { return 1 - x; } |

**Exponential**

I also suggest to **avoid **placing a** big loop** in an “exponential function” or a **recursion **(like the function **pow**), since it could require a lot of resources in some hardware. I suggest to write single easing functions and name them with their power value, such as “**EaseInQuadratic**” will have an “**x*x**“. “**EaseInCubic**” will have “**x*x*x**” and so on.

**EASE OUT**

What if we want to show a **rocket’s landing**? Since our rocket **decelerates** while landing we need the opposite of EaseIn.

We could take the **EaseIn** graph and flip it, obtaining this:

The function now is slower at the end but we want it to start from 0 and reach 1, otherwise it will work inversely as intended. We can flip the progress inside the power, having this as the result:

That’s it! Now our object is **slower at the end**, which means that our rocket will reach its destination decelerating!

P.S. Dont be distracted because the ball is going up, it only means that it’s reaching the destination.

Do you remember? if the percentage is **1 **it means that we reached our** end point** (which is up in this example). If you set the target destination below the object it will go down.

The **EaseOut** function is the following:

1 2 3 4 5 6 | public static float EaseOut(float t) { return Flip(Square(Flip(t))); } |

This is the result if we elevate the progress in three different ways:

**EASE IN OUT**

What if we want our rocket to start AND land using the same easing function? Well, we need it to start accelerating (EaseIn) and stop decelerating (EaseOut), creating a EaseInOut. We need to “use the last function the nearest we are with the end”….we need a **Lerp**!

The EaseInOut function is the following:

1 2 3 4 5 6 | public static float EaseInOut(float t) { return Lerp(EaseIn(t), EaseOut(t), t); } |

The more we progress the less we’ll use EaseIn.

**SPIKE**

“**Mirrored**” easing functions are mostly used for “UI” animations, since they reach their destination and then they go back at their initial state. You can imagine **a “pop up**“, **a click on a button **that increases its size and then resets it, […].

I like to call it “**Spike**” because its graph reminds me it and also because you can easily move a spike in a game using this!

We start with an **EaseIn** but this time we need to reach **1** when **50**% of the time elapsed. This means adding a simple **if** condition to our code and divide by **0.5f**.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | public static float Spike(float t) { if (t <= .5f) return EaseIn(t / .5f); //TO DO } |

When we’ve reached **.5f** we need the opposite and reach the start again. We need to “**mirror**” the **EaseIn**, so we’ll use it again but in **reverse**.

Our (final) code is the following:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | public static float Spike(float t) { if (t <= .5f) return EaseIn(t / .5f); return EaseIn(Flip(t)/.5f); } |

In the image I showed earlier I used “**Spike2**“, where I **raised **the parameter given in each **EaseIn? to a power of 2**.

**More of them!**

Now that you know a lot of basic functions, play with them!

Here are my references: Robert Penner’s easing functions, http://gizma.com/easing/ (to look at some functions), https://gist.github.com/Fonserbc/3d31a25e87fdaa541ddf (to look at other functions).

I experimented a bit and here’s the result:

I also suggest this GDC Video: Math for Game Programmers: Fast and Funky 1D Nonlinear Transformations , where you can also have another explanation on easing functions.